Joined
·
40 Posts
Has anybody try these jackets, maybe the forum could get use a discount on them.
http://www.rugerlcp.com/category/179-SigArms_Tactical_Coats.aspx
http://www.rugerlcp.com/category/179-SigArms_Tactical_Coats.aspx
the sig jackets are ok, they bare no sig arms marking on them. Actualy just look like a nice well made jacket.Sandy said:Buying tactical coats and shirts and all the "stuff" will only brand you as someone who has a firearm and will put you at a disadvantage.
big big difference in the fanny pack and the sig jacket. The sig jacket bears no resembance of a carry jacket, virtually nothing on the outside of the jacket to indicate anything other than a good made jacket.. to me it screams "nice jacket" A fanny pack screams a multitue of things, inlcuding a hiding place for a handgun..skywagon said:;DSandy is rite, just like the fanny pack, it screems GUN!!!!!!!
nope definitely not needed for the lcp, but if one desires alittlel bigger handgun, it sure comes in nice.TheShooter said:Do you really think you need a jacket to conceal the LCP? I guess the jacket has it's place.