Re: AMMUNITION POLL "What's been best or worst for you ?"
gglass said:
Other than the marketing video put out by Hornady, have you actually seen any real reviews of Critical Defense? This is a product that I would like to embrace, but I have not seen any real world reviews against other modern SD ammo brands.
I did some comparison testing with the CD along with other brands. It delivers what it promises - expansion, regardless of circumstances. The drawback to any sort of testing is that only medium for which results are really relevant - the bodies of BGs - is one we can't use for testing. So, we have to take test results and make some guesses.
There is no way around the laws of physics - for a given load there will always be a tradeoff between expansion and penetration. Loads that expand more are going to penetrate less, and vice versa. With a relatively low powered round like the .380, penetration is going to be marginal anyway. Add a lot of expansion to that and you have a bullet which is going to tear a large but shallow wound. I think they would be the cat's meow in higher powered rounds where overpenetration is an issue - like .38 +P and .357. But, for the .380 I am going to favor penetration over expansion. I'm going to do my tests on BB, Corbon, DPX, and Golden Sabers as soon as the weather warms up, but based on what I've tested so far I would use CCI Speer Gold Dots, Federal HST, and Magtech Golden Guardians in that order. I got less penetration (but more expansion) out of the CD than from Hornady's ordinary XTP/JHP - which is a load I would skip all around.